Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Second Season

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Second Season Review


See more picture


In my mind I pair Seasons One and Two and then Seasons Three through Seven. I enjoyed both the first two seasons and both are thoroughly enjoyable. The series got a whole lot better after these two seasons, but that isn't at all to suggest that these are not good. They are and had the next five seasons been only as good as these first two it would have gone down as a very good series, but it was the final seasons that really put the series on the TV SF map and made it, in my opinion, the best of the STAR TREK franchise.

Although it did not develop yet the story arcs that would dominate the show in future seasons, the show nonetheless improved through a deepening of character development and a number of fascinating episodes. There are a lot of people who feel that the nineties was the finest decade ever for TV SF (and based on sheer numbers I think that may be true, if you include FARSCAPE, which started in 1999, and such non-space SF shows like THE X-FILES). Certainly among the top SF series of the nineties, DS9 is near the top. While this decade has seen some great SF -- in particular BATTLESTAR GALACTICA -- one can only hope that we will someday see the sheer quantity that we saw with DS9, FARSCAPE, BABYLON 5, ST:THE NEXT GENERATION, SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND, STAGATE SG-1, STAR TREK VOYAGER, THE X-FILES, EARTH 2, and ROSWELL. There has been a great deal of SF in this decade, but most of it has been of the non-outer space kind. Unfortunately, with the towering exception of BSG, too much of the outer space SF has either been merely a carry over of nineties shows, spin offs of those shows, tragically cancelled way too soon (FIREFLY), or of unbelievably low quality (how did ANDROMEDA last so long?). Wouldn't it be wonderful to see a new space opera on TV? I'm loving STARGATE UNIVERSE, but it is a spin off. I'd really love to see something something entirely original. AMC is exploring the possibility of a TV adaptation of Kim Stanley Robinson's great Mars Trilogy. As it stand right now, however, the only space opera is STARGATE UNIVERSE. CAPRICA looks like it will be a splendid BSG prequel, but it isn't clear that it isn't going to have any outer space elements at all.

After watching the first two seasons I've moved right into Season Three. As good as the first two seasons are, it really gets better once, as they say, the plot thickens. Frankly, I had forgotten how good this was. It is always great when you remember something as being good, but when you rewatch it, you discover that it is even better than you remembered. 26 episodes on 7 discs: The Homecoming, The Circle, The Siege, Invasive Procedures, Cardassians, Melora, Rules of Acquisition, Necessary Evil, Second Sight, Sanctuary, Rivals, The Alternate, Armageddon Game, Whispers, Paradise, Shadowplay, Playing God, Profit and Loss, Blood Oath, The Maquis Part I, The Maquis Part II, The Wire, Crossover, The Collaborator, Tribunal, The Jem'Hadar.


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

one of the best "trek" permutations - Sarah Shaver - West Virginia
Our family, especially my husband, really enjoys Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. I know many in the fandom give it no love, and it died a sort of ignoble death the last season or so. The actors and their characters, especially Avery Brooks' Capt. Sisko, were so dynamic - perhaps the best Trek cast, imho. I'll admit the series had to grow on me, as I was angry at the cancellation of "ST:NG." In the second season the show really found it's legs and became more than "that show that replaced STNG." The great mythology deepened - what does it mean for Sisko to be the Emissary? Who are the Prophets? - and the relationships between the characters does as well. We get to know Quark and his Ferengi clan better, and Odo's mysterious life is addressed. The box and case the DVDs come in is very handsome and sturdy. Great to watch these after all these years!

DS9 is growing on me.. - Nom de Plume - St Johns, Fl
I guess you could call me a big fan. I have all episodes of TOS,TNG,VOY and all the movies on DVD. I never got into DS9 when I was younger, so I thought I'd give it another shot. I'm glad I did. DS9 is gritty and real. In TNG for example, everyone got along and there was no real conflict between the characters. DS9 offers a more realistic look at people. They get angry, fight, and even hate each other at times, but when you get down to brass tacks, they get the job at hand done regardless of how they feel about each other. I can't wait to buy seasons 3-7.


Jun 30, 2010 19:43:06

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete First Season

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete First Season Review


See more picture


A lot of people point out that Season One of STAR TREK DEEP SPACE 9 suffered from growing pains and that is certainly true. DS9 was, in my opinion, the best of all the STAR TREK series, and it while the storylines that drove the series and made it such an enormously enjoyable series were not there in the early seasons, it wasn't like the show was mud in the early seasons. In fact, while the show got incredibly good in later seasons, it was still, even in its first couple of seasons, absolutely first rate.

One of the ironies for me is that if I were to do a list of my all time favorite STAR TREK characters, few from DS9 would make the list. Odo is perhaps my favorite, but as a rule I find the cast to be more than the some of the parts. For instance, I think it is a better ensemble cast than VOYAGER, but I like The Doctor and Seven more than anyone on DS9. But this cast really fits together well in telling stories and even in Season One, before the big story arcs get under way, they feel like a great team.

DS9 is famously the darkest ST series, with more ongoing storylines than any other ST series. In a way, having the series set in a particular location helps lead to this. The original series, THE NEXT GENERATION, and VOYAGER were all focused on spaceships always in motion and always encountering new species and planets and phenomena. But DS9 would have gotten old quick with nothing but a visitor-of-the-week fomat. And given the initial premise of the Federation on DS9 acting as a buffer between the Bajorans and the Cardassians. With the later addition of the Maquis and the meeting of the Dominion, the show had a degree of political and narrative complexity utterly lacking in the other series. In many ways, DS9 is more reminiscent of BABYLON 5 than THE NEXT GENERATION. It is interesting, by the way, that those two shows, that resemble each other in many ways, ran almost concurrently.

What is most delightful in rewatching this is how well it has stood up over time. Part of it is that its aesthetic and tone anticipated what has become more pervasive in TV SF. This was true even before Ronald D. Moore moved over to DS9 from TNG at the start of Season Three. Moore, of course, was the creator of the reimagined BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. I've just finished rewatching Seasons One and Two and have begun Season Three. I don't want to say that Moore was the only reason the show got so good in Season Three, but he was clearly one of the reasons. But my point here is that even in Seasons One and Two, before it got completely into gear, it was a very good and enjoyable series. 20 episodes on 6 discs: Emissary Part I, Emissary Part II, Past Prologue, A Man Alone, Babel, Captive Pursuit, Q-Less, Dax, The Passenger, Move Along Home, The Nagus, Vortex, Battle Lines, The Storyteller, Progress, If Wishes Were Horses, The Forsaken, Dramatis Personae, Duet, In the Hands of the Prophets.


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Star Trek junky since thr 60's - Maria T. Maulorico - Bel Air, MD, US
When I was a kid back in the 60's my dad made us leave a neighbors dinner so that we could watch the first episode of "Star Trek". Since then I have been a "treky" (sp) & have watched it & every incarnation since the beginning. I haven't gotten into the newer Star Trek where it starts with a brand new James T. Kirk because it feels more like their just trying to ruin what I grew up with. Deep Space 9, Voyager & TNG are all spin-offs of the original & that makes them, in my book - it makes them that much better because the story lines & new graphics & special effects make them that much better. DS9 is a wonderful spin-off of Star Trek & being that it revolves around a space station rather than the constant going here & there in the universe makes it special in it's own way. I give the DS9 series a 10 thumbs up!!!

Maria Maulorico, daughter of Alfred Maulorico the first & best Star Trek junky I ever knew.

A problematic beginning - Christopher Culver -
This DVD makes for an uncomfortable review to write. I fondly remember the launch of STAR TREK: DEEP SPACE 9 in early 1993 which seemed to re-envigorate the Star Trek franchise and offer some new storytelling possibilities. Seeing these early episodes again nearly two decades later, the start of this series is so rocky as to be nearly unwatchable. While the long dramatic arc of later years was pretty decent, this first season is awkward to say the least. Basically, the writers had several aspects to focus on: Gamma Quadrant, Bajoran politics and continuity with the pre-existing Star Trek canon. But instead of a cohesive presentation of these, we jump from one to another with each episode, and we're often still in Gene Rodenberry's Star Trek vibe where everyone is so jolly and peaceful. Once one starts noticing little cracks in the facade, the whole thing seems even more lame: the meaningless technobabble, the chronological problems, the unrealistic aliens, the distances that change wildly depending on storytelling needs, etc.

The only saving grace is some of the acting. It's amazing how the presence of Rene René Auberjonois and Armin Shimerman can overcome the mediocre writing, as does Harris Yulin's masterful guest appearance as a soldier tormented by memories of the atrocities his side committed. The stories can be exceedingly stupid, but they're acted out so well that it does sometimes make for compelling television.

Because of my own disappointment, I'd really suggest that you purchase this DVD set only if you have seen these episodes recently and definitely know you want them. Don't just go by 17 year-old memories.


Jun 29, 2010 16:33:10

Star Trek Fan Collective - Captain's Log

Star Trek Fan Collective - Captain's Log Review


See more picture


If you are a Star Trek fan - or interested in becoming one or just want to learn what the hype is about regarding the new Star Trek movie coming soon (Star Trek 11 - Due May 8th 2009) - then this is your definative collection to watch and learn from.

It contains some of the best episodes from all FIVE series regarding the captains and te stories that revolve around what it means to be a Starship Capatain.

The details, commentary and text commentary included as bonuses is extremely interesting and quite educational. Production, sets, inside jokes and fine details are revealed. The special features that each disc also contain interviews with all the actors who played all the legendary captains and is charming, funny and completely intriguing into what made these episode special for them! William Shatner, Patrick Stewart, Avery Brooks, Kate Mulgrew and Scott Backula and all down-to-earth and very sharp.

A must for all Star Trek fans and for those who want a real taste of what the last 46 years STAR TREK has had to offer television and film...get this collection! Watch it with the family and I guarentee you'll be discussing the stories and characters long after the shows are over!
3-26-09

Star Trek Fan Collective - Captain's Log Feature

  • ISBN13: 0097361237244
  • Condition: NEW
  • Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
OK, all you Trekkers who have been resisting the Star Trek: Fan Collective series on principle because it's an inexpensive repackaging of the episodes you already have on DVD. Captain's Log, the fifth in the series, raises the bar, not just by including a fifth disc, but by providing a host of brand-new content. As usual, fans selected the initial 10 episodes--two per series--but each "captain"--William Shatner, James T. Kirk of the Original Series; Patrick Stewart, Jean-Luc Picard of The Next Generation; Avery Brooks, Benjamin Sisko of Deep Space Nine; Kate Mulgrew, Kathryn Janeway of Voyager; and Scott Bakula, Jonathan Archer of Enterprise--picked a third episode as a personal favorite. Each captain then introduces the selected episode in about a one-minute segment (the exception is Shatner, who dishes for 12 minutes about "The City on the Edge of Forever," joined partway through by co-star Joan Collins), and in most cases, introduces the fan-selected ones as well. Finally, each captain is interviewed in a series of featurettes (some with common themes, such as "The Importance of the Captain's Log," "What Makes a Good Captain," or the character's legacy or future) lasting 8 to 12 minutes total. (Brooks' segments don't follow the themes and appear to be recorded a while back.) And thankfully, of all the episodes in the set--"The City on the Edge of Forever," "The Enterprise Incident," and "Balance of Terror" from the Original Series; "In Theory," "Chain of Command," and "Darmok" from The Next Generation; "Far Beyond the Stars," "What You Leave Behind" parts 1 and 2, and "In the Pale Moonlight" from Deep Space Nine; "Counterpoint," "The Omega Directive," and "Flashback" from Voyager; and "Judgment," "These Are the Voyages," and "First Flight" from Enterprise--only "The City on the Edge of Forever" is repeated from a previous Fan Collective, and it's hard to complain about seeing that episode too many times. --David Horiuchi The fans and captains have spoken! Not only have Star Trek fans voted online for their all-time favorite captain episodes from all five Star Trek series, but each show’s legendary leader Captain Kirk, Patrick Stewart, Avery Brooks, Kate Mulgrew, and Scott Bakula has carefully chosen their favorite episode, which resulted in Star Trek: Fan Collective Captain’s Log.


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Another great collection for the poverty-stricken Star Trek fan - Robert Schmidt - Honolulu, HI USA
I'd love to have the complete Star Trek collections. Alas, the price of these worthy series (well, there is that series, Enterprise...) prohibits all but the most committed fan from owning them.

For the rest of us, there is the Star Trek Fan Collective series.

This one, Star Trek Fan Collective - Captain's Log, consists of a fave pick from each captain (James T. Kirk of the Original Series, Jean-Luc Picard of The Next Generation, Benjamin Sisko of Deep Space Nine, Kathryn Janeway of Voyager, and Jonathan Archer of Enterprise), plus two (sometimes part 1 and 2) of picks from "fans." Now, I'm not sure who the "fans" were... nobody asked me! I'm not complaining. I like the choices, and some of my other favorites show up in the other Star Trek Fan Collective series, especially the ones featuring the Klingons and the Borg.

I'm not a big fan of the "extras" that come with these sets, but they are there for those who do appreciate them.

How can one refuse this collection? Put it on your wish list.

Captains Log, Captain Speaking! - Bobbie Joe -
The Star Treck Fan collective contains all the best episodes featuring each captain from every season voted in by fans. It has new interviews with the cast members of star treck.

I recommend it to all Star Treck fans.


Jun 28, 2010 10:54:04

Star Trek Fan Collective - Q

Star Trek Fan Collective - Q Review


See more picture


As Star Trek TNG fans know, Q has been one of the most consistently interesting villains in the entire franchise. In each of his episodes, he presents the crew of the Enterprise with a new moral dilemma, making not only for some of the most entertaining shows, but also the most thought provoking. John de Lancie plays the part superbly and combines an arrogance with a certain humor and ruefulness that bring a great sense of comedic relief to Star Trek. It's great to finally have all of the episodes on one disc.

My favorite Q scene: In TNG's "Tapestry," Picard is in bed (hairy chest and all) after what is presumably a night with an attractive young female. A hand from offscreen gently reaches to touch his hair. As Picard turns to look at his partner, the camera pans right to reveal Q in a Starfleet uniform beside Picard, smiling ruefully. Gotta love it!

My only problem is that the discs are not HD quality and don't have much commentary. Hopefully future versions will.

It would have been great to have a TNG movie with Q (rather than the pathetic Remans). Alas, at least we have this set! 4-DVD set collects the favorite episodes featuring the popular character "Q."


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Q it up again! - freshbakedmama -
Of all the bizarre, dramatic, engaging, and, well,...bizarre story-telling within the Trek universe, the Q episodes were the most memorable. Q was the character that allowed the writers the most room for real creativity, in my opinion. Q visitations usually gave rise to the best dialogue and situational humor, which may not have been the primary thing trekkies were looking for in Trek, but loads of fun, nonetheless. This dvd collection is full of the best the franchise has to offer in that arena.

John DeLancie, who plays Q, is the best, most subtle actor ever to show his face on the bridge of the Enterprise, and it's just pure fun to watch him portray the unpredictable, unquantifiable Q.

The Q episodes, in perhaps more purely Trek fashion, also offered the opportunity to explore some thought-provoking questions about the meaning of being human, civilized, and evolved. Of course, this was a t.v. series, so the writing mostly sort of waded in the shallow end of some very deep pools. It's enough dark water, however, to make these episodes watchable by an audience outside the fan collective.

If you like Star Trek, this is probably the collection to own. If you love Star Trek, you're going to go for them all anyway...



Jun 27, 2010 05:46:06

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Third Season

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Third Season Review


See more picture


Too many series start off well, only to drag a bit after the second or third season (e.g., SUPERNATURAL right now). Even BUFFY, as great as it was, was not as good after Season three as it had been before (with the exception of the glorious Season Five). But ST:DS9 was only getting started and peaked in its later half. (So too did ST:VOYAGER to a lesser degree.) The Dominion loomed more and more as a story in Season Three, beginning to drive many of the main story lines. And relations between several of the main characters began to take shape.

One of my complaints with all of the STAR TREK series is the generally weak development of character. If you contrast any STAR TREK series with other series that are noted for their character development like BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER or VERONICA MARS or -- staying within SF -- FARSCAPE or BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, the STAR TREK shows are remarkable for their lack of character development. There is definitely more development than in the STARGATE series (with the possible exception of the new STARGATE UNIVERSE, which looks like it is going to depart from the three earlier series -- and yes, there were three earlier series, one of which almost no one knows anything about). Although I've had debates with people about characters like Jean-Luc Picard and whether they truly develop or whether they merely add details to his character without actually altering him, I can find almost no real development among the vast majority of STAR TREK characters. (Though one has to add the caveat that there is some development in the movies, especially in someone like Spock and Data.) The one truly huge exception are the various characters who lie just outside the human. STAR TREK excels at characters that expand our understanding of what kind of entities can be considered persons. It began in the original series with Spock, who was nonetheless half human. But his half-Vulcan nature was a groundbreaking development on TV SF. It continued with Data on ST:TNG, easily the most important TV robot (and on a sidenote, since Data virtually all artificial people on TV since Data have been cyborgs -- Data has no serious competitor as TV's most important robot, a mechanical man with no biological parts). That series had many other characters that expanded the possibility of our understanding of personhood. ST:VOYAGER would later have two of my favorite STAR TREK characters along these lines, the Doctor and Seven of Nine, the latter actually a real human who was trying to reclaim her personhood after having been reduced to a nonperson by being a Borg drone. The two characters on ST:DS9 who work along these lines are Dax and Odo. Frankly, while I liked Dax, I was never able to accept the notion of a race of people who aspired to being the host of a symbiote. It was an interesting idea and they certainly gave it their best shot, but they never managed to make the sacrifice of one's individuality plausible. (The only convincing depiction that I have ever encountered in SF was in the superb pair of SF novels by Hal Clement, NEEDLE and EYE OF THE NEEDLE, in which a symbiote enters a human unaware of its presence. But there the blending was not a conscious act by the host.) Odo is one of my favorite STAR TREK characters, not least because of the marvelous performance by Rene Auberjonois. He, Data, and the Doctor (from ST:VOYAGER) are the three STAR TREK characters who push the boundary of the Person furthest. Odo is especially delightful in that he has no necessary shape, except for the one that he has decided to adapt, and even that one, not terribly well. Unlike the other Founders, he isn't able to form himself into a precise human form. And you have to love that every sixteen hours he has to refresh himself by going to rest in a bucket. Odo is also one of the saddest STAR TREK characters, early in the series yearning to discover others like him, only in Season Two to learn that he belongs to an imperialistic, merciless species. His refusal to join his kind renders him a permanent exile. And his absolute otherness means that he can find no love, even though he harbors a deep affection for Kira. Frankly, without characters like Odo and the Doctor and Seven of Nine and Data and Spock, I probably would find little to enjoy in the STAR TREK shows. The stories too often smack of the tales from the pulp era of SF. But the best nonhuman -- or only partly human -- characters are a source of endless delight.

As a BATTLESTAR GALACTICA fan, I would like to point out that this was the season when Ronald D. Moore, the creator of BSG, joined ST:DS9. From Seasons three through seven, he would be one of the three most important writers on the show. I think his documented unwillingness to tread over familiar ground helped push the series into new territory. Plus, I always had a soft spot in my heart for him, not just because we share a last name and first initial, but because he was the one who killed my least favorite STAR TREK universe character, James T. Kirk (a character I detest largely because of William Shatner's acting, which I personally consider among the worst in the history of TV -- his acting decisions beggar the imagination).

The best thing about Season Three is that although it was quite good, it would be quickly surpassed. The show was just beginning to find its stride. Episodes: The Search Parts I and II, The House of Quark, Equilibrium, Second Skin, The Abandoned, Civil Defense, Meridian, Defiant, Fascination, Past Tense Parts I and II, Life Support, Heart of Stone, Destiny, Prophet Motive, Visionary, Distant Voices, Through the Looking Glass, Improbable Cause, The Die Is Cast, Explorers, Family Business, Shakaar, Facets, The Adversary.


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Third Season - jondibrit - Florida
Excellent Sci-Fi series. Full of lovable characters and villains. Lots of action, inter-personal relationships and some humorous moments as well.



Jun 25, 2010 20:08:08

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Fourth Season

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Fourth Season Review


See more picture


Season Four of DS9 was very much of the same quality of the previous three seasons. The larger story arcs involving the Cardassians, the Klingons, the Dominion, and the Federation were deepened and continued. What astonished me most about DS9 was how consistently good it was. This season was as strong as the previous ones and contained a host of great standalone episodes in addition to furthering the overall story.

One thing that I found especially interesting was the way that they handled Nana Visitor's real-life pregnancy. The basic decision in these situations is whether or not to hide the pregnancy or make it part of the plot. On THE X-FILES, they put lots of trench coats on Gillian Anderson to disguise her pregnancy and put her behind a lot of tall counters. Roxann Dawson's character B'Elanna Torres on STAR TREK: VOYAGER took to wearing her jacket unbuttoned, so that it would billow around her midsection. Other shows work the pregnancy into the story (interestingly, in one episode of VOYAGER B'Elanna Torres is shown in a fictitious sequence set in Nazi-occupied Europe pregnant, so her pregnancy did make it into the series after all, albeit briefly). Sydney Bristow's pregnancy became a major component in ALIAS. But Nana Visitor's pregnancy is probably unique in the history of TV. Initially the pregnancy was that of the O'Brien's and I have wondered whether that pregnancy was already on the books when Nana Visitor learned that she was pregnant, or whether the O'Brien's pregnancy was created in order to provide a cover for Visitor's real life pregnancy. But the notion of having Keiko's fetus moved to Kira's womb. Definitely one of the more innovative responses to a cast member's pregnancy in the history of TV.

So, who said consistent is bad. Sometimes consistent just means consistently good. Although DS9 was already my favorite STAR TREK series, I had never actually seen every single episode. So this time through is a lot of fun, seeing several new episodes that I had never previously seen. The result has been that DS9 is even more my favorite STAR TREK series than it was before. STAR TREK DEEP SPACE NINE is set on a space station orbiting the planet Bajor. Commander Benjamin Sisko (Brooks) is in charge of a diverse crew who must fight off rival alien species who want to control DS9 because of its strategic position close to a wormhole that allows speedy travel to the far reaches of space. Season 4 includes the episodes "Broken Link" and "The Visitor," which TV Guide included in its Top 35 Star Trek episodes ever story (Aapril 20-26, 2002). "The Visitor" was listed as the #4 favorite.


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Best Star Trek Series Ever. - M. E. Mitchell - California
Do not miss out on this series. Yes it is different from the normal wandering the universe, but it shows more character development. The stories are well thought out for the most part, and there is no lack of conflicy.



Jun 24, 2010 16:42:10

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Review


See more picture


Too many series start off well, only to drag a bit after the second or third season (e.g., SUPERNATURAL right now). Even BUFFY, as great as it was, was not as good after Season three as it had been before (with the exception of the glorious Season Five). But ST:DS9 was only getting started and peaked in its later half. (So too did ST:VOYAGER to a lesser degree.) The Dominion loomed more and more as a story in Season Three, beginning to drive many of the main story lines. And relations between several of the main characters began to take shape.

One of my complaints with all of the STAR TREK series is the generally weak development of character. If you contrast any STAR TREK series with other series that are noted for their character development like BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER or VERONICA MARS or -- staying within SF -- FARSCAPE or BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, the STAR TREK shows are remarkable for their lack of character development. There is definitely more development than in the STARGATE series (with the possible exception of the new STARGATE UNIVERSE, which looks like it is going to depart from the three earlier series -- and yes, there were three earlier series, one of which almost no one knows anything about). Although I've had debates with people about characters like Jean-Luc Picard and whether they truly develop or whether they merely add details to his character without actually altering him, I can find almost no real development among the vast majority of STAR TREK characters. (Though one has to add the caveat that there is some development in the movies, especially in someone like Spock and Data.) The one truly huge exception are the various characters who lie just outside the human. STAR TREK excels at characters that expand our understanding of what kind of entities can be considered persons. It began in the original series with Spock, who was nonetheless half human. But his half-Vulcan nature was a groundbreaking development on TV SF. It continued with Data on ST:TNG, easily the most important TV robot (and on a sidenote, since Data virtually all artificial people on TV since Data have been cyborgs -- Data has no serious competitor as TV's most important robot, a mechanical man with no biological parts). That series had many other characters that expanded the possibility of our understanding of personhood. ST:VOYAGER would later have two of my favorite STAR TREK characters along these lines, the Doctor and Seven of Nine, the latter actually a real human who was trying to reclaim her personhood after having been reduced to a nonperson by being a Borg drone. The two characters on ST:DS9 who work along these lines are Dax and Odo. Frankly, while I liked Dax, I was never able to accept the notion of a race of people who aspired to being the host of a symbiote. It was an interesting idea and they certainly gave it their best shot, but they never managed to make the sacrifice of one's individuality plausible. (The only convincing depiction that I have ever encountered in SF was in the superb pair of SF novels by Hal Clement, NEEDLE and EYE OF THE NEEDLE, in which a symbiote enters a human unaware of its presence. But there the blending was not a conscious act by the host.) Odo is one of my favorite STAR TREK characters, not least because of the marvelous performance by Rene Auberjonois. He, Data, and the Doctor (from ST:VOYAGER) are the three STAR TREK characters who push the boundary of the Person furthest. Odo is especially delightful in that he has no necessary shape, except for the one that he has decided to adapt, and even that one, not terribly well. Unlike the other Founders, he isn't able to form himself into a precise human form. And you have to love that every sixteen hours he has to refresh himself by going to rest in a bucket. Odo is also one of the saddest STAR TREK characters, early in the series yearning to discover others like him, only in Season Two to learn that he belongs to an imperialistic, merciless species. His refusal to join his kind renders him a permanent exile. And his absolute otherness means that he can find no love, even though he harbors a deep affection for Kira. Frankly, without characters like Odo and the Doctor and Seven of Nine and Data and Spock, I probably would find little to enjoy in the STAR TREK shows. The stories too often smack of the tales from the pulp era of SF. But the best nonhuman -- or only partly human -- characters are a source of endless delight.

As a BATTLESTAR GALACTICA fan, I would like to point out that this was the season when Ronald D. Moore, the creator of BSG, joined ST:DS9. From Seasons three through seven, he would be one of the three most important writers on the show. I think his documented unwillingness to tread over familiar ground helped push the series into new territory. Plus, I always had a soft spot in my heart for him, not just because we share a last name and first initial, but because he was the one who killed my least favorite STAR TREK universe character, James T. Kirk (a character I detest largely because of William Shatner's acting, which I personally consider among the worst in the history of TV -- his acting decisions beggar the imagination).

The best thing about Season Three is that although it was quite good, it would be quickly surpassed. The show was just beginning to find its stride. Deep Space Nine's third season begins eventfully, with Sisko promoted to Captain and being given a prototype warship equipped with a cloaking device, while Odo learns where he came from. In the two-part opening tale, this clever gambit is played to hook viewers into the idea of DS9 becoming an ongoing mystery/conflict show. Why the sudden intense change in format? Mostly it was to ensure the show continued to thrive, when a rather greedy production hierarchy fast-tracked Voyager onto the air mid-season (cue unnecessary crossover episode with Tuvok). Of greater concern was ratings thief Babylon 5, which played its counter-Trek cards at precisely the right time. Fortunately the result (initially at least) was a genuine boost for DS9.

Cast members seemed to have hit their stride and played off one another more assuredly than before. For example, Odo's character took several additional interesting twists, especially in his relationship with Kira. Rene Auberjonois had a very good year, directing two episodes to boot. Avery Brooks had begun this trend with the previous year's penultimate show. The real surprise was seeing Jonathan Frakes's name working behind the camera on three occasions, because he also appeared on screen in his alternate rogue Riker role, when Thomas dramatically steals the Defiant. Other welcome cameos that aided the feeling of casual camaraderie included the return of Lwaxana Troi, as well as first appearances by Quark's mother, the spooky Founder Leader, the lovely Leeta, and the sneaky Eddington. Clint Howard--a cult Trek figure--was briefly welcomed back, and with the many faces of Jeffrey Combs another was born. Stories advanced the complicated Bajoran/Cardassian healing process, while simultaneously brewing potential conflicts far worse than the behind-the-scenes ratings war. --Paul Tonks


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Star Trek Deep Space Nine - The Complete Third Season - jondibrit - Florida
Excellent Sci-Fi series. Full of lovable characters and villains. Lots of action, inter-personal relationships and some humorous moments as well.



Jun 21, 2010 19:24:08

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: The Complete Series (Seasons 1-7)

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: The Complete Series (Seasons 1-7) Review


See more picture


Why precisely was DS9 the finest of the STAR TREK series? It had a very good cast, though not clearly the best of the various series in the franchise. Deep Space 9, the space station, was not especially compelling nor were the sets much different than other shows. I think the reason it easily surpassed the other shows in quality was the political premise of the show and the way they stuck with that from beginning to end. While Cardassians, Romulans, and Klingons appeared on other series, only DS9 fully exploited the potential of their struggles with one another. The introduction of the Bajorans, the Jem'Hadar, the Dominion, and the Breen gave the series a complexity that none of the other series even remotely approached. Long story arcs always give series more depth and focus, and this was one of the great limiting factors in the other series, all of which relied on standalone formats without any real overarching story, even VOYAGER, which had a long story arc built into its very structure, that it failed to embrace.

While the main cast was not clearly better than other STAR TREK series, the cast of recurring characters were far and away to best. Garak, Gul Dukat, Rom, Nog, Martak, Keiko, Leeta, Zek the Grand Nagus, Weyoun and Brunt (both played by Jeffrey Combs), Damar, Vic Fontaine, and many others gave the show a marvelous depth and diversity. Oh, and we can't forget Morn, perhaps the most famous TV character never to have uttered a single word of dialogue. The show also does the best job of the various TREKs of fully exploiting the contrasting cultures of the various races. I never really came to like the Klingons in any of the series and DS9 shows it as a rather foolish culture, with hints that they were on the verge of collapse and change. I was slow to like the Ferengi, but I came to enjoy the absurd light they are used to place hyper free market capitalists in our own society (sort of Milton Friedman taken to his logical extreme).

Although DS9 depended upon a mythology developed in the original series and refined in THE NEXT GENERATION, the series actually resembles BABYLON 5 more than those shows. Both were set in space stations built beside wormholes. Both dealt with ongoing political conflicts. Both had commanders with a prophetic destiny. Both began at roughly the same time (DS9 began in January 1993 while BABYLON 5's Season One began in 1994, but the made for TV movie that served as a back door pilot was released in Feberuary of 1993). B5 has a substantial number of passionate fans. I am not among them. I have a number of problems with it, from what I believe is weaknesses in the writing deriving from a lack of a strong writing staff (J. Michael Stracyznski, though unquestionably a very good writer, simply tried to shoulder too much of he writing, despite not being very good with humor and writing somewhat stilted dialogue -- I think the show would have been stronger if he had allowed other writers to take on much of the burden, allowing him to work more on redaction) and rather extreme over acting and rather bizarre character design (I am thinking of Peter Jurasik's ridiculous hair and absurd accent). I understand completely what aspects of B5 some find appealing, but they generally are not bothered as I am by the weaknesses of the show, or at least are able to overlook them. DS9's overall story arc doesn't contain quite the degree of pathos of B5, what with the tragic story of Londo and the complex fate of G'Kar, but I find it overall a more consistently successful series, with fewer of the missteps that marred B5.

I have found in discussions that a surprising number of people who have watched the original series and THE NEXT GENERATION, or even VOYAGER, have not seen DEEP SPACE NINE. Of the four major series in the franchise (I see ENTERPRISE as a rather minor offshoot of the other series), this was the least watched series despite being by far the best. I think part of the explanation for that lies in the more involved story. With the other three series, you could easily miss a dozen or two episodes and completely enjoy an episode, understanding every aspect of the episode. But if you missed a dozen episodes of DS9, you would find things completely changed since the previous episode. This reflects the ongoing evolution of the story.

Although I've seen all of the STAR TREK series at least twice all the way through, this is the one series that I would be most interested in rewatching once again. I have to admit that all in all I'm not a huge STAR TREK fan, but I am very definitely a DS9 fan. In my own ranking of the best SF series of all time, this is the one STAR TREK series that I would rank up with BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (which was headed by DS9 alum Ronald D. Moore), FIREFLY, and FARSCAPE. Any serious fan of TV SF has probably seen this a couple of times already, but I think something that Nana Visitor said in the extras for the Season Seven box set is true, that people might have liked this when they first watched it, but upon rewatching it they are going to be genuinely surprised at how good it is. And the mark of a good series is definitely that it is better the second time through. Studio: Paramount Home Video Release Date: 01/24/2006


Check price now

Related Products

Customer Reviews

Beware of Chinese Bootlegs - Valar1 - Kalifornia, USA
Don't be fooled by the people offering a "brand new factory sealed" DS9 set for ridiculously cheap prices [mine was 100 bucks cheaper than the official Amazon price]- they are bootlegs from China, they are new, do look similar to the US official sets but are defective in quality- you can tell the difference because of the cheapness of the plastic used for the cover, cheap paint used to paint the logo on the discs, and the fact that the discs have bubbles in them. They may or may not freeze when played depending on the quality of your player. You are getting ripped off, they cost 1/5th to 1/10th in China, these guys claim they are from the US, they do claim to have addresses here but they have the sets shipped directly from China to your home [takes about 3 weeks to arrive] and you wind up paying for shoddy stuff. I know this because it happened to me, I wound up filing a claim with Amazon, and thank god those guys are honest and helped me recover my money. So- 5 stars for the show, 5 stars for Amazon, and negative 5 for the bootleg selling scum

I love DS9, but some of the discs was coded right - Keith O. Judon -


I LOVE DEEP SPACE NINE. This show never got credit it deserves or the respect. However with the particular discs I bought, some of them was not coded or programmed right. Instead of getting the selection menu to navigate through each episode, I got the coded information behind it, and while I was able to play all the episodes I was still limited in being able to easily navigate through seasons 5-7.

keith


Jun 13, 2010 17:56:06